Seleccionar página

Regrettably, these conclusions may not be verified through DNA fingerprinting which decreases validation and dependability, consequently, further analysis to verify

DNA-17 Profiling. [Online]. 2019. Crown Prosecution Provider. Available from: https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/dna-17-profiling [Accessed: 5 Might 2019].

  • Ferembach, D., (1980). Suggestions for age and intercourse diagnoses of skeletons. Journal of Human Evolution. 9(7), 517-549. Available from: doi:10.1016/0047-2484(80)90061-5.
  • Giles, E. and Elliot, O., (1963). Intercourse dedication by discriminant function analysis of crania. United states Journal of Bodily Anthropology. 21(1), 53-68. Available from: doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330210108
  • Giles, E., (1970). Discriminant function sexing for the peoples skeleton. Personal Identification in Mass Disasters. In Stewart TD (ed.)99-107.
  • Krogman, W., (1962). The peoples skeleton in forensic medication. United states Journal of Orthodontics. 49(6), 474. Available from: doi:10.1016/0002-9416(63)90175-1.
  • McPherson, M., Quirke, P. & Taylor, G., (1992). PCR: a practical approach. Oxford, IRL.
  • Meindl, R. and Lovejoy, C., (1985). Ectocranial suture closing: A revised way of the dedication of skeletal age at death in line with the lateral-anterior sutures. United states Journal of Bodily Anthropology. 68(1), 57-66. Available from: doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330680106.
  • Miles, A., (1963). Dentition within the Estimation of Age. Journal of Dental Analysis. 42(1), 255-263. Available from: doi:10.1177/00220345630420012701
  • Molleson, T and Cox, M., (1993). The Spitalfields Venture, Vol. 2: The Anthropology. The Middling Type, Analysis Report 86. Council for British Archaeology: York.
  • NIDDK., (2012). Acromegaly | NIDDK. [online] National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Offered at: https://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/endocrine-diseases/acromegaly [Viewed 21 April 2019].
  • Phenice, T., (1969). A newly developed artistic way of sexing the os pubis. United states Journal of Bodily Anthropology. 30(2), 297-301. Available from: doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330300214.
  • Rissech, C., Estabrook, G., Cunha, E. and Malgosa, A., (2006). Making use of the Acetabulum to calculate Age at loss of Adult Males*. Journal of Forensic Sciences.  51(2), 213-229. Available from: doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00060.x
  • Scheuer, L. & Ebony, S., (2004). The juvenile skeleton. London, Elsevier Academic Press.
  • Sutherland, L. and Suchey, J., (1991) utilization of the Ventral Arc in Pubic Intercourse Determination. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 36(2), 13051J. Available from: doi:10.1520/jfs13051j.
  • Todd, T., (1921). Age alterations in the pubic bone tissue. United states Journal of Bodily Anthropology. 4(1), 1-70. Available from: doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330040102
  • Trotter, M., (1970). Estimation of stature from intact long limb bones, in Stewart, T.D. (ed.), Personal Identification in Mass Disasters: National Museum of Natural History, Washington, 71-83.
  • Appendices

    Appendix A

    Feature

    dimension (mm)

    Cranial size

    187.22

    Cranial breadth

    111.47

    Basion-bregma height

    138.67

    Bizygomatic breadth

    131.39

    Basion prosthion size

    121.63

    Nasion-prosthion line

    68.21

    Maxillo-alveolar breadth

    67.25

    Height for the processus mastoideus

    36.67

    These dimensions had been then inputted to the formula below to find out intercourse through the skull.

    Discriminant function formula (Giles & Elliot, 1963):

    (Cranial length*3.107) + (Cranial breadth*-4.643) + (Basion-bregma height*5.786) + (bizygomatic breadth*14.821) + (Basion prosthion length*1.000) + (Nasion-prosthion line*2.714) + (Maxillo-alveolar breadth*-5.179) + (Height regarding the processus mastoideus*6.071)

    If outcome is bigger than 2676.39, the individual is male, if smaller compared to 2676.39, the individual is feminine.

    Appendix B

    Feature

    dimension (mm)

    Hipbone height (A)

    212

    Iliac breadth (B)

    161

    Pubis length (C)

    71.675

    Ischium length (D)

    88.41

    Femur head diameter (E)

    45.45

    Epicondylar breadth of femur (F)

    75.26

    There dimensions where then inputted to the formula below Albanese’s (2003) to find out intercourse through the femur and pelvis.

    Likelihood M/F=1(1+e–Z)

    Model 1, Z = -61.5345 + (0.595*A) – (0.5192*B) – (1.1104*D) + (1.1696*E) + (0.5893*F)

    Model 2, Z = -40.5313 + (0.2572*A) – (0.9852*C) + (0.7303*E) + (0.3177*F)

    Model 3, Z = -30.359 + (0.4323*A) – (0.2217*B) – (0.7404*C) + (0.3412*D)

    If P is more than 0.5, the individual is male, if P is significantly less than 0.5, the individual is feminine.

    Appendix C

    listing of corresponding states and many years for every for the 7 acetabulum variables Rissech’s (2006)

    1. Acetabular groove
      • State 1 – predicted age: 41.6
    2. Acetabular rim shape
      • State 3 – predicted age: 45.9
    3. Acetabular rim porosity
      • State 2 – predicted age: 39
    4. Apex task
      • State 1 – predicted age: 38.2
    5. task in the external side of the fossa that is acetabular 2 – predicted age: 32.3
    6. task for the acetabular fossa
      • State 3 – predicted age: 48.1
    7. Porosities for the acetabular fossa Share this: Facebook Twitter Reddit LinkedIn WhatsApp  

    reflective essay about biology

    consequently, to locate a match, AFLP ought to be duplicated ensuring there clearly was sufficient, unfragmented DNA along side a suitable, high specificity primer. Primer dimers at the end of lane 9 implies the primer concentration had been excessive, consequently, to prevent allelic dropout that might assume homozygosity, reduced levels ought to be utilized whenever saying.

    AFLP requires good quality and quantity of DNA to avoid allelic dropout, but, it is most likely that this may not be accomplished with this DNA test. Consequently, DNA-17 might provide greater results since it calls for less DNA because of improved sensitiveness and discrimination between pages (Crown Prosecution provider, 2019).

    Conclusion

    After analysing all results, one could estimate it was a European male aged between 32 and 43 who had been 174cm high, managing acromegaly. The most likely reason for death is co-morbidity connected with acromegaly progression. Regrettably, these conclusions may not be verified through DNA fingerprinting which decreases validation and dependability, consequently, further analysis to verify this individual’s identification could consist of more dependable methods involving molecular biology and bone tissue chemistry.

    Recommendations

    • Albanese, J., (2003).  A Metric Method for Intercourse Determination utilizing the Hipbone and also the Femur. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 48(2), 2001378. Available from: doi:10.1520/jfs2001378.
    • Bass, W., (1978). Individual osteology. Columbia, Mo., Missouri Archaeological Community, 196-208.
    • Ebony, T., (1978). Intimate dimorphism within the tooth-crown diameters for the deciduous teeth. United states Journal of Bodily Anthropology. 48(1), 77-82. Available from: doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330480111.
    • Brooks, S. and Suchey, J., (1990). Skeletal age dedication in line with the os pubis: an evaluation for the Acsádi-Nemeskéri and Suchey-Brooks techniques. Individual Evolution. 5(3), 227-238. Available from: doi:10.1007/bf02437238.
    • Carr, L., (1962). Eruption ages of permanent teeth. Australian Dental Journal. 7(5), 367-373. Available from: doi:10.1111/j.1834-7819.1962.tb04884.x.
    • Chapman, I., (2017). Gigantism and Acromegaly – Hormonal and Metabolic Disorders – MSD handbook customer variation. [Online]. 2017. MSD Handbook Customer Variation. Available from: https://www.msdmanuals.com/en-gb/home/hormonal-and-metabolic-disorders/pituitary-gland-disorders/gigantism-and-acromegaly [Accessed: 27 April 2019].
    • Church, MS., (1995). Determination of Race through the Skeleton through Forensic Anthropological techniques. Forensic Science Review. 7(1), 1-39
    • Crown Prosecution Provider., (2019). DNA-17 Profiling. [Online]. 2019. Crown Prosecution Provider. Available from: https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/dna-17-profiling [Accessed: 5 Might 2019].
    • Ferembach, D., (1980). Suggestions for age and intercourse diagnoses of skeletons. Journal of Human Evolution. 9(7), 517-549. Available from: doi:10.1016/0047-2484(80)90061-5.
    • Giles, E. and Elliot, O., (1963). Intercourse dedication by discriminant function analysis of crania. United states Journal of Bodily Anthropology. 21(1), 53-68. Available from: doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330210108
    • Giles, E., (1970). Discriminant function sexing for the peoples skeleton. Personal Identification in Mass Disasters. In Stewart TD (ed.)99-107.
    • Krogman, W., (1962). The peoples skeleton in forensic medication. United states Journal of Orthodontics. 49(6), 474. Available from: doi:10.1016/0002-9416(63)90175-1.
    • McPherson, M., Quirke, P. & Taylor, G., (1992). PCR: a practical approach. Oxford, IRL.
    • Meindl, R. and Lovejoy, C., (1985). Ectocranial suture closing: A revised way of the dedication of skeletal age at death in line with the lateral-anterior sutures. United states Journal of Bodily Anthropology. 68(1), 57-66. Available from: doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330680106.
    • Miles, A., (1963). Dentition within the Estimation of Age. Journal of Dental Analysis. 42(1), 255-263. Available from: doi:10.1177/00220345630420012701
    • Molleson, T and Cox, M., (1993). The Spitalfields Venture, Vol. 2: The Anthropology. The Middling Type, Analysis Report 86. Council for British Archaeology: York.
    • NIDDK., (2012). Acromegaly | NIDDK. [online] National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Offered at: https://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/endocrine-diseases/acromegaly [Viewed 21 April 2019].
    • Phenice, T., (1969). A newly developed artistic way of sexing the os pubis. United states Journal of Bodily Anthropology. 30(2), 297-301. Available from: doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330300214.
    • Rissech, C., Estabrook, G., Cunha, E. and Malgosa, A., (2006). Making use of the Acetabulum to calculate Age at loss of Adult Males*. Journal of Forensic Sciences.  51(2), 213-229. Available from: doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00060.x
    • Scheuer, L. & Ebony, S., (2004). The juvenile skeleton. London, Elsevier Academic Press.
    • Sutherland, L. and Suchey, J., (1991) utilization of the Ventral Arc in Pubic Intercourse Determination. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 36(2), 13051J. Available from: doi:10.1520/jfs13051j.
    • Todd, T., (1921). Age alterations in the pubic bone tissue. United states Journal of Bodily Anthropology. 4(1), 1-70. Available from: doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330040102
    • Trotter, M., (1970). Estimation of stature from intact long limb bones, in Stewart, T.D. (ed.), Personal Identification in Mass Disasters: National Museum of Natural History, Washington, 71-83.

    Appendices

    Appendix A

    Feature

    dimension (mm)

    Cranial size

    187.22

    Cranial breadth

    111.47

    Basion-bregma height

    138.67

    Bizygomatic breadth

    131.39

    Basion prosthion size

    121.63

    Nasion-prosthion line

    68.21

    Maxillo-alveolar breadth

    67.25

    Height for the processus mastoideus

    36.67

    These dimensions had been then inputted to the formula below to find out intercourse through the skull.

    Discriminant function formula (Giles & Elliot, 1963):

    (Cranial length*3.107) + (Cranial breadth*-4.643) + (Basion-bregma height*5.786) + (bizygomatic breadth*14.821) + (Basion prosthion length*1.000) + (Nasion-prosthion line*2.714) + (Maxillo-alveolar breadth*-5.179) + (Height regarding the processus mastoideus*6.071)

    If outcome is bigger than 2676.39, the individual is male, if smaller compared to 2676.39, the individual is feminine.

    Appendix B

    Feature

    dimension (mm)

    Hipbone height (A)

    212

    Iliac breadth (B)

    161

    Pubis length (C)

    71.675

    Ischium length (D)

    88.41

    Femur head diameter (E)

    45.45

    Epicondylar breadth of femur (F)

    75.26

    There dimensions where then inputted to the formula below Albanese’s (2003) to find out intercourse through the femur and pelvis.

    Likelihood M/F=1(1+e–Z)

    Model 1, Z = -61.5345 + (0.595*A) – (0.5192*B) – (1.1104*D) + (1.1696*E) + (0.5893*F)

    Model 2, Z = -40.5313 + (0.2572*A) – (0.9852*C) + (0.7303*E) + (0.3177*F)

    Model 3, Z = -30.359 + (0.4323*A) – (0.2217*B) – (0.7404*C) + (0.3412*D)

    If P is more than 0.5, the individual is male, if P is significantly less than 0.5, the individual is feminine.

    Appendix C

    listing of corresponding states and many years for every for the 7 acetabulum variables Rissech’s (2006)

    1. Acetabular groove
      • State 1 – predicted age: 41.6
    2. Acetabular rim shape
      • State 3 – predicted age: 45.9
    3. Acetabular rim porosity
      • State 2 – predicted age: 39
    4. Apex task
      • State 1 – predicted age: 38.2
    5. task in the external side of the fossa that is acetabular 2 – predicted age: 32.3
    6. task for the acetabular fossa
      • State 3 – predicted age: 48.1
    7. Porosities for the acetabular fossa Share this: Facebook Twitter Reddit LinkedIn WhatsApp  

    AFLP requires good quality and quantity of DNA to avoid allelic dropout, but, it is most likely that this may not be accomplished with this DNA test. Consequently, DNA-17 might provide greater results since it calls for less DNA because of improved sensitiveness and discrimination between pages (Crown Prosecution provider, 2019).

    Conclusion

    After analysing all results, one could estimate it was a European male aged between 32 and 43 who had been 174cm high, managing acromegaly. The most likely reason for death is co-morbidity connected with acromegaly progression. Regrettably, these conclusions may not be verified through DNA fingerprinting which decreases validation and dependability, consequently, further analysis to verify this individual’s identification could consist of more dependable methods involving molecular biology and bone tissue chemistry.

    Recommendations

    • Albanese, J., (2003).  A Metric Method for Intercourse Determination utilizing the Hipbone and also the Femur. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 48(2), 2001378. Available from: doi:10.1520/jfs2001378.
    • Bass, W., (1978). Individual osteology. Columbia, Mo., Missouri Archaeological Community, 196-208.
    • Ebony, T., (1978). Intimate dimorphism within the tooth-crown diameters for the deciduous teeth. United states Journal of Bodily Anthropology. 48(1), 77-82. Available from: doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330480111.
    • Brooks, S. and Suchey, J., (1990). Skeletal age dedication in line with the os pubis: an evaluation for the Acsádi-Nemeskéri and Suchey-Brooks techniques. Individual Evolution. 5(3), 227-238. Available from: doi:10.1007/bf02437238.
    • Carr, L., (1962). Eruption ages of permanent teeth. Australian Dental Journal. 7(5), 367-373. Available from: doi:10.1111/j.1834-7819.1962.tb04884.x.
    • Chapman, I., (2017). Gigantism and Acromegaly – Hormonal and Metabolic Disorders – MSD handbook customer variation. [Online]. 2017. MSD Handbook Customer Variation. Available from: https://www.msdmanuals.com/en-gb/home/hormonal-and-metabolic-disorders/pituitary-gland-disorders/gigantism-and-acromegaly [Accessed: 27 April 2019].
    • Church, MS., (1995). Determination of Race through the Skeleton through Forensic Anthropological techniques. Forensic Science Review. 7(1), 1-39
    • Crown Prosecution Provider., (2019). DNA-17 Profiling. [Online]. 2019. Crown Prosecution Provider. Available from: https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/dna-17-profiling [Accessed: 5 Might 2019].
    • Ferembach, D., (1980). Suggestions for age and intercourse diagnoses of skeletons. Journal of Human Evolution. 9(7), 517-549. Available from: doi:10.1016/0047-2484(80)90061-5.
    • Giles, E. and Elliot, O., (1963). Intercourse dedication by discriminant function analysis of crania. United states Journal of Bodily Anthropology. 21(1), 53-68. Available from: doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330210108
    • Giles, E., (1970). Discriminant function sexing for the peoples skeleton. Personal Identification in Mass Disasters. In Stewart TD (ed.)99-107.
    • Krogman, W., (1962). The peoples skeleton in forensic medication. United states Journal of Orthodontics. 49(6), 474. Available from: doi:10.1016/0002-9416(63)90175-1.
    • McPherson, M., Quirke, P. & Taylor, G., (1992). PCR: a practical approach. Oxford, IRL.
    • Meindl, R. and Lovejoy, C., (1985). Ectocranial suture closing: A revised way of the dedication of skeletal age at death in line with the lateral-anterior sutures. United states Journal of Bodily Anthropology. 68(1), 57-66. Available from: doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330680106.
    • Miles, A., (1963). Dentition within the Estimation of Age. Journal of Dental Analysis. 42(1), 255-263. Available from: doi:10.1177/00220345630420012701
    • Molleson, T and Cox, M., (1993). The Spitalfields Venture, Vol. 2: The Anthropology. The Middling Type, Analysis Report 86. Council for British Archaeology: York.
    • NIDDK., (2012). Acromegaly | NIDDK. [online] National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Offered at: https://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/endocrine-diseases/acromegaly [Viewed 21 April 2019].
    • Phenice, T., (1969). A newly developed artistic way of sexing the os pubis. United states Journal of Bodily Anthropology. 30(2), 297-301. Available from: doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330300214.
    • Rissech, C., Estabrook, G., Cunha, E. and Malgosa, A., (2006). Making use of the Acetabulum to calculate Age at loss of Adult Males*. Journal of Forensic Sciences.  51(2), 213-229. Available from: doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00060.x
    • Scheuer, L. & Ebony, S., (2004). The juvenile skeleton. London, Elsevier Academic Press.
    • Sutherland, L. and Suchey, J., (1991) utilization of the Ventral Arc in Pubic Intercourse Determination. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 36(2), 13051J. Available from: doi:10.1520/jfs13051j.
    • Todd, T., (1921). Age alterations in the pubic bone tissue. United states Journal of Bodily Anthropology. 4(1), 1-70. Available from: doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330040102
    • Trotter, M., (1970). Estimation of stature from intact long limb bones, in Stewart, T.D. (ed.), Personal Identification in Mass Disasters: National Museum of Natural History, Washington, 71-83.

    Appendices

    Appendix A

    Feature

    dimension (mm)

    Cranial size

    187.22

    Cranial breadth

    111.47

    Basion-bregma height

    138.67

    Bizygomatic breadth

    131.39

    Basion prosthion size

    121.63

    Nasion-prosthion line

    68.21

    Maxillo-alveolar breadth

    67.25

    Height for the processus mastoideus

    36.67

    These dimensions had been then inputted to the formula below to find out intercourse through the skull.

    Discriminant function formula (Giles & Elliot, 1963):

    (Cranial length*3.107) + (Cranial breadth*-4.643) + (Basion-bregma height*5.786) + (bizygomatic breadth*14.821) + (Basion prosthion length*1.000) + (Nasion-prosthion line*2.714) + (Maxillo-alveolar breadth*-5.179) + (Height regarding the processus mastoideus*6.071)

    If outcome is bigger than 2676.39, the individual is male, if smaller compared to 2676.39, the individual is feminine.

    Appendix B

    Feature

    dimension (mm)

    Hipbone height (A)

    212

    Iliac breadth (B)

    161

    Pubis length (C)

    71.675

    Ischium length (D)

    88.41

    Femur head diameter (E)

    45.45

    Epicondylar breadth of femur (F)

    75.26

    There dimensions where then inputted to the formula below Albanese’s (2003) to find out intercourse through the femur and pelvis.

    Likelihood M/F=1(1+e–Z)

    Model 1, Z = -61.5345 + (0.595*A) – (0.5192*B) – (1.1104*D) + (1.1696*E) + (0.5893*F)

    Model 2, Z = -40.5313 + (0.2572*A) – (0.9852*C) + (0.7303*E) + (0.3177*F)

    Model 3, Z = -30.359 + (0.4323*A) – (0.2217*B) – (0.7404*C) + (0.3412*D)

    If P is more than 0.5, the individual is male, if P is significantly less than 0.5, the individual is feminine.

    Appendix C

    listing of corresponding states and many years for every for the 7 acetabulum variables Rissech’s (2006)

    1. Acetabular groove
      • State 1 – predicted age: 41.6
    2. Acetabular rim shape
      • State 3 – predicted age: 45.9
    3. Acetabular rim porosity
      • State 2 – predicted age: 39
    4. Apex task
      • State 1 – predicted age: 38.2
    5. task in the external side of the fossa that is acetabular 2 – predicted age: 32.3
    6. task for the acetabular fossa
      • State 3 – predicted age: 48.1
    7. Porosities for the acetabular fossa Share this: Facebook Twitter Reddit LinkedIn WhatsApp  

    After analysing all results, one could estimate it was a European male aged between 32 and 43 who had been 174cm high, managing acromegaly. The most likely reason for death is co-morbidity connected with acromegaly progression. Regrettably, these conclusions may not be verified through DNA fingerprinting which decreases validation and dependability, consequently, further analysis to verify this individual’s identification could consist of more dependable methods involving molecular biology and bone tissue chemistry.

    Recommendations

    • Albanese, J., (2003).  A Metric Method for Intercourse Determination utilizing the Hipbone and also the Femur. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 48(2), 2001378. Available from: doi:10.1520/jfs2001378.
    • Bass, W., (1978). Individual osteology. Columbia, Mo., Missouri Archaeological Community, 196-208.
    • Ebony, T., (1978). Intimate dimorphism within the tooth-crown diameters for the deciduous teeth. United states Journal of Bodily Anthropology. 48(1), 77-82. Available from: doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330480111.
    • Brooks, S. and Suchey, J., (1990). Skeletal age dedication in line with the os pubis: an evaluation for the Acsádi-Nemeskéri and Suchey-Brooks techniques. Individual Evolution. 5(3), 227-238. Available from: doi:10.1007/bf02437238.
    • Carr, L., (1962). Eruption ages of permanent teeth. Australian Dental Journal. 7(5), 367-373. Available from: doi:10.1111/j.1834-7819.1962.tb04884.x.
    • Chapman, I., (2017). Gigantism and Acromegaly – Hormonal and Metabolic Disorders – MSD handbook customer variation. [Online]. 2017. MSD Handbook Customer Variation. Available from: https://www.msdmanuals.com/en-gb/home/hormonal-and-metabolic-disorders/pituitary-gland-disorders/gigantism-and-acromegaly [Accessed: 27 April 2019].
    • Church, MS., (1995). Determination of Race through the Skeleton through Forensic Anthropological techniques. Forensic Science Review. 7(1), 1-39
    • Crown Prosecution Provider., (2019). DNA-17 Profiling. [Online]. 2019. Crown Prosecution Provider. Available from: https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/dna-17-profiling [Accessed: 5 Might 2019].
    • Ferembach, D., (1980). Suggestions for age and intercourse diagnoses of skeletons. Journal of Human Evolution. 9(7), 517-549. Available from: doi:10.1016/0047-2484(80)90061-5.
    • Giles, E. and Elliot, O., (1963). Intercourse dedication by discriminant function analysis of crania. United states Journal of Bodily Anthropology. 21(1), 53-68. Available from: doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330210108
    • Giles, E., (1970). Discriminant function sexing for the peoples skeleton. Personal Identification in Mass Disasters. In Stewart TD (ed.)99-107.
    • Krogman, W., (1962). The peoples skeleton in forensic medication. United states Journal of Orthodontics. 49(6), 474. Available from: doi:10.1016/0002-9416(63)90175-1.
    • McPherson, M., Quirke, P. & Taylor, G., (1992). PCR: a practical approach. Oxford, IRL.
    • Meindl, R. and Lovejoy, C., (1985). Ectocranial suture closing: A revised way of the dedication of skeletal age at death in line with the lateral-anterior sutures. United states Journal of Bodily Anthropology. 68(1), 57-66. Available from: doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330680106.
    • Miles, A., (1963). Dentition within the Estimation of Age. Journal of Dental Analysis. 42(1), 255-263. Available from: doi:10.1177/00220345630420012701
    • Molleson, T and Cox, M., (1993). The Spitalfields Venture, Vol. 2: The Anthropology. The Middling Type, Analysis Report 86. Council for British Archaeology: York.
    • NIDDK., (2012). Acromegaly | NIDDK. [online] National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Offered at: https://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/endocrine-diseases/acromegaly [Viewed 21 April 2019].
    • Phenice, T., (1969). A newly developed artistic way of sexing the os pubis. United states Journal of Bodily Anthropology. 30(2), 297-301. Available from: doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330300214.
    • Rissech, C., Estabrook, G., Cunha, E. and Malgosa, A., (2006). Making use of the Acetabulum to calculate Age at loss of Adult Males*. Journal of Forensic Sciences.  51(2), 213-229. Available from: doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00060.x
    • Scheuer, L. & Ebony, S., (2004). The juvenile skeleton. London, Elsevier Academic Press.
    • Sutherland, L. and Suchey, J., (1991) utilization of the Ventral Arc in Pubic Intercourse Determination. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 36(2), 13051J. Available from: doi:10.1520/jfs13051j.
    • Todd, T., (1921). Age alterations in the pubic bone tissue. United states Journal of Bodily Anthropology. 4(1), 1-70. Available from: doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330040102
    • Trotter, M., (1970). Estimation of stature from intact long limb bones, in Stewart, T.D. (ed.), Personal Identification in Mass Disasters: National Museum of Natural History, Washington, 71-83.

    Appendices

    Appendix A

    Feature

    dimension (mm)

    Cranial size

    187.22

    Cranial breadth

    111.47

    Basion-bregma height

    138.67

    Bizygomatic breadth

    131.39

    Basion prosthion size

    121.63

    Nasion-prosthion line

    68.21

    Maxillo-alveolar breadth

    67.25

    Height for the processus mastoideus

    36.67

    These dimensions had been then inputted to the formula below to find out intercourse through the skull.

    Discriminant function formula (Giles & Elliot, 1963):

    (Cranial length*3.107) + (Cranial breadth*-4.643) + (Basion-bregma height*5.786) + (bizygomatic breadth*14.821) + (Basion prosthion length*1.000) + (Nasion-prosthion line*2.714) + (Maxillo-alveolar breadth*-5.179) + (Height regarding the processus mastoideus*6.071)

    If outcome is bigger than 2676.39, the individual is male, if smaller compared to 2676.39, the individual is feminine.

    Appendix B

    Feature

    dimension (mm)

    Hipbone height (A)

    212

    Iliac breadth (B)

    161

    Pubis length (C)

    71.675

    Ischium length (D)

    88.41

    Femur head diameter (E)

    45.45

    Epicondylar breadth of femur (F)

    75.26

    There dimensions where then inputted to the formula below Albanese’s (2003) to find out intercourse through the femur and pelvis.

    Likelihood M/F=1(1+e–Z)

    Model 1, Z = -61.5345 + (0.595*A) – (0.5192*B) – (1.1104*D) + (1.1696*E) + (0.5893*F)

    Model 2, Z = -40.5313 + (0.2572*A) – (0.9852*C) + (0.7303*E) + (0.3177*F)

    Model 3, Z = -30.359 + (0.4323*A) – (0.2217*B) – (0.7404*C) + (0.3412*D)

    If P is more than 0.5, the individual is male, if P is significantly less than 0.5, the individual is feminine.

    Appendix C

    listing of corresponding states and many years for every for the 7 acetabulum variables Rissech’s (2006)

    1. Acetabular groove
      • State 1 – predicted age: 41.6
    2. Acetabular rim shape
      • State 3 – predicted age: 45.9
    3. Acetabular rim porosity
      • State 2 – predicted age: 39
    4. Apex task
      • State 1 – predicted age: 38.2
    5. task in the external side of the fossa that is acetabular 2 – predicted age: 32.3
    6. task for the acetabular fossa
      • State 3 – predicted age: 48.1
    7. Porosities for the acetabular fossa Share this: Facebook Twitter Reddit LinkedIn WhatsApp  

    Recommendations

    • Albanese, J., (2003).  A Metric Method for Intercourse Determination utilizing the Hipbone and also the Femur. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 48(2), 2001378. Available from: doi:10.1520/jfs2001378.
    • Bass, W., (1978). Individual osteology. Columbia, Mo., Missouri Archaeological Community, 196-208.
    • Ebony, T., (1978). Intimate dimorphism within the tooth-crown diameters for the deciduous teeth. United states Journal of Bodily Anthropology. 48(1), 77-82. Available from: doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330480111.
    • Brooks, S. and Suchey, J., (1990). Skeletal age dedication in line with the os pubis: an evaluation for the Acsádi-Nemeskéri and Suchey-Brooks techniques. Individual Evolution. 5(3), 227-238. Available from: doi:10.1007/bf02437238.
    • Carr, L., (1962). Eruption ages of permanent teeth. Australian Dental Journal. 7(5), 367-373. Available from: doi:10.1111/j.1834-7819.1962.tb04884.x.
    • Chapman, I., (2017). Gigantism and Acromegaly – Hormonal and Metabolic Disorders – MSD handbook customer variation. [Online]. 2017. MSD Handbook Customer Variation. Available from: https://www.msdmanuals.com/en-gb/home/hormonal-and-metabolic-disorders/pituitary-gland-disorders/gigantism-and-acromegaly [Accessed: 27 April 2019].
    • Church, MS., (1995). Determination of Race through the Skeleton through Forensic Anthropological techniques. Forensic Science Review. 7(1), 1-39
    • Crown Prosecution Provider., (2019). DNA-17 Profiling. [Online]. 2019. Crown Prosecution Provider. Available from: https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/dna-17-profiling [Accessed: 5 Might 2019].
    • Ferembach, D., (1980). Suggestions for age and intercourse diagnoses of skeletons. Journal of Human Evolution. 9(7), 517-549. Available from: doi:10.1016/0047-2484(80)90061-5.
    • Giles, E. and Elliot, O., (1963). Intercourse dedication by discriminant function analysis of crania. United states Journal of Bodily Anthropology. 21(1), 53-68. Available from: doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330210108
    • Giles, E., (1970). Discriminant function sexing for the peoples skeleton. Personal Identification in Mass Disasters. In Stewart TD (ed.)99-107.
    • Krogman, W., (1962). The peoples skeleton in forensic medication. United states Journal of Orthodontics. 49(6), 474. Available from: doi:10.1016/0002-9416(63)90175-1.
    • McPherson, M., Quirke, P. & Taylor, G., (1992). PCR: a practical approach. Oxford, IRL.
    • Meindl, R. and Lovejoy, C., (1985). Ectocranial suture closing: A revised way of the dedication of skeletal age at death in line with the lateral-anterior sutures. United states Journal of Bodily Anthropology. 68(1), 57-66. Available from: doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330680106.
    • Miles, A., (1963). Dentition within the Estimation of Age. Journal of Dental Analysis. 42(1), 255-263. Available from: doi:10.1177/00220345630420012701
    • Molleson, T and Cox, M., (1993). The Spitalfields Venture, Vol. 2: The Anthropology. The Middling Type, Analysis Report 86. Council for British Archaeology: York.
    • NIDDK., (2012). Acromegaly | NIDDK. [online] National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Offered at: https://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/endocrine-diseases/acromegaly [Viewed 21 April 2019].
    • Phenice, T., (1969). A newly developed artistic way of sexing the os pubis. United states Journal of Bodily Anthropology. 30(2), 297-301. Available from: doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330300214.
    • Rissech, C., Estabrook, G., Cunha, E. and Malgosa, A., (2006). Making use of the Acetabulum to calculate Age at loss of Adult Males*. Journal of Forensic Sciences.  51(2), 213-229. Available from: doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00060.x
    • Scheuer, L. & Ebony, S., (2004). The juvenile skeleton. London, Elsevier Academic Press.
    • Sutherland, L. and Suchey, J., (1991) utilization of the Ventral Arc in Pubic Intercourse Determination. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 36(2), 13051J. Available from: doi:10.1520/jfs13051j.
    • Todd, T., (1921). Age alterations in the pubic bone tissue. United states Journal of Bodily Anthropology. 4(1), 1-70. Available from: doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330040102
    • Trotter, M., (1970). Estimation of stature from intact long limb bones, in Stewart, T.D. (ed.), Personal Identification in Mass Disasters: National Museum of Natural History, Washington, 71-83.

    Appendices

    Appendix A

    Feature

    dimension (mm)

    Cranial size

    187.22

    Cranial breadth

    111.47

    Basion-bregma height

    138.67

    Bizygomatic breadth

    131.39

    Basion prosthion size

    121.63

    Nasion-prosthion line

    68.21

    Maxillo-alveolar breadth

    67.25

    Height for the processus mastoideus

    36.67

    These dimensions had been then inputted to the formula below to find out intercourse through the skull.

    Discriminant function formula (Giles & Elliot, 1963):

    (Cranial length*3.107) + (Cranial breadth*-4.643) + (Basion-bregma height*5.786) + (bizygomatic breadth*14.821) + (Basion prosthion length*1.000) + (Nasion-prosthion line*2.714) + (Maxillo-alveolar breadth*-5.179) + (Height regarding the processus mastoideus*6.071)

    If outcome is bigger than 2676.39, the individual is male, if smaller compared to 2676.39, the individual is feminine.

    Appendix B

    Abrir chat